Wednesday, March 16, 2016

Risen (2016)


A movie review by Father Scott Archer
March 4, 2016

A movie based on a Biblical event which is covered in only one chapter of each of the first three gospels, and just two in the fourth, should, at the very least, remain faithful to the source material; furthermore, it should not be considered as presumptuous to expect that any use of artistic license would not change the original story. Risen, a film written by Kevin Reynolds and Paul Aiello, and directed by the former, fails on both counts, needlessly abandoning the Gospel in favor of elements which are alien to the original story. Beyond that, this movie depicts interactions between the Apostles and followers of Christ as being more reminiscent of a modern charismatic prayer meeting than of any scholarly consensus regarding the nature of early Christian communities. 

The story is centered on the eye witness account of Clavius (Joseph Fiennes), a Roman tribune present at the crucifixion, who eventually searches for the body of Christ, and finally becomes a believer. The movie begins with Clavius presiding over the crucifixion of Christ. This scene should be fairly straight forward: The Gospel of John tells us, “Now there stood by the cross of Jesus, his mother and his mother’s sister, Mary of Cleophas, and Mary Magdalen. When Jesus therefore had seen his mother and the disciple whom he loved... (John 19:26-27). Instead of the scene so clearly described in the Gospel of John, Risen presents the viewer with the Blessed Mother, the only time we see her, standing at a great distance away, with Mary Magdalen. The Blessed Mother is wailing loudly, though this is not recorded in Scripture, and John the Apostle is not seen at all.

One would think a movie about the resurrection would show the resurrection. The movie shows a stone rolled in front of the tomb, and later ropes were used to secure it to the tomb, but there was no depiction of the resurrection.  The movie does not stay true to the gospels in regard to Christ’s resurrection appearances. In one scene Christ healed a leper. The resurrection was the ultimate miracle to prove that He was the Christ, the Incarnate Son of God. After witnessing the resurrection, there would be no need for further miracles. Finally, to my utter amazement, there was no Ascension! In the end, Christ simply walked backwards as he spoke a few of the words recorded in Scripture.

Throughout, the depiction of the apostles and Christ, played by Cliff Curtis, was beyond distracting. There was a lot of hugging and laughing. The character of Bartholomew, when not laughing at being threatened with crucifixion, stared with glistening eyes as he spoke of his faith. When the other apostles and Christ were not laughing, they were hugging. Another distraction was the continued use of the name Yeshua instead of Jesus. It made no sense, given the fact that all the other characters were called by their English names; for example, Mary, Peter, Andrew, and Bartholomew.


Risen fails because it ignores much of the Scriptural accounts of these events, it portrays the Blessed Mother, Jesus, and the apostles in ways foreign to our traditional understanding of their characters, and it adds material that makes no sense in the context of the story. There are wonderful movies that have been made about the life of Christ; this is not one of them.